Monday, July 25, 2011

I'm going to blame my lack of blogging over the last few months on my thesis defense and then my wedding. No time to write when there are things to get done. So of course, now, when I should be writing the thesis, I'll write here instead. At least it gets me in writing mode?

I'll try to be good and just post a quicky here - a pic of the finished wedding dress:

With the husband and his sister. The first thought I had when I saw pictures of me in the dress was "I look like a cake topper!" And I mean that in the best possible way.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Scarves

When I started playing with shibori dying, especially arashi pole-wraps, I discovered that silk scarves are the perfect thing to play with - a long rectangle is the perfect shape, and a scarf can have a lot louder pattern than a whole garment. But once I made a few, I discovered that I don't really know how to wear them. So I've collected a set of links here to remind me, once I have to time to play with dye again.

For credit purposes, I should note that these came from Academic Chic's bibliography. I picked out the ones I like, and I'm basically saving them here for my reference.

French Twist. Not sure how this would actually look, but it looks interesting enough to try.

Twisted pashmina: I have to think this would work just as well with a nice long silk scarf, just ending up a bit thinner.

And a variety of cool scarf ties.

And a quick note - yeah, I haven't posted anything in quite a while. There's less than one month till my PhD defense, so time to blog is not exactly a thing I have. Unless, as today, I'm waiting while my experiment runs. Come June, I plan on actually using some of the masses of fabric I've been stocking up on.

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Topped

Sigh. After spending basically the entire month of March handsewing the bodice with nice invisible stitches, the quality just was not there. Especially around curves, the strips gaped and you could see the stitches underneath. Not pretty.
I had hoped it would go away with excessive steam pressing, but no. It did get better (this is after), but not enough. So, machine top-stitching it was.
Luckily, I really like the way it looks. I debated between subtle top-stitching ("invisible" thread that is basically fishing line) or blatant top-stitching with sparkly metallic thread. I liked the idea of the sparkly - make a bug into a feature and embrace the top-stitching. Unfortunately, the way the tread sewed on my machine wasn't great, and I also think it was just a touch too blatant. I've struggled throughout the process to not just throw more and more design details at this dress. The weaving design is complex enough and can stand on its own, adding more and more will just detract from its elegance. So, invisible thread it is.

I actually really like the way the invisible thread looks with the topstitching - you can tell that it's there, but you don't really see the thread, just its imprint, so it ends up looking like the strips have slightly scalloped edges. By emphasizing the edges of the strips just a little bit, it really makes the design pop.
So all in all, while I'm frustrated to have spend so long on handwork that ended up just functioning as basting, I'm happy with the end product. I think that's a lesson I need to remember - just because you invested a lot of effort into something doesn't mean that's the way it should be.

Now if I can just get it to not look quite so wrinkly after pressing...

Friday, March 25, 2011

Vogue Summer 2011

New patterns! Of course I'm looking through the new Vogue patterns instead of editing that paper, did you have to ask?

I think I only like one pattern that's not a dress, so let's start there.
Vogue 1247: The shirt is whatever, and really so is the skirt (besides being way shorter than anything I'd ever wear), but I love the idea of in-seam pockets in a horizontal seam. I'm not sure I like the way it actually looks, but it's novel and interesting so it's a winner in my book.

Vogue 1239: Love the collar and of course the pockets, and the wrap style that means no zipper is needed. I'm definitely picturing silk duopioni to give it some texture and make all the seaming pop. I do worry that it'll be a bit too stiff to actually be practical - I don't mind impractical in formalwear, but this doesn't scream formal to me.

Vogue 1235: Now this I can actually see making. I've avoided knit dresses in the past simply because the selection of knits at Joann, my only local fabric store out in the suburbs, is atrocious. They have a few solids which are fine, but that's it. Living in San Francisco for the last month, I've found new fabric stores, and it's definitely worth going back to the city to shop. This dress looks simple and cute (although they mark it as average difficulty, which scares me a bit considering the scale that Vogue works on), and I'm a sucker for pockets. I'm not sure how well they'll hold up in a knit, so I'm curious to see if there's any extra interfacing or anything in the pattern. This dress has a bit of the gathering on the hips that seems to be in style now, and showed up in a bunch of the new patterns. I'm generally not a fan (my hips are perfectly sized as they are, thank-you-very-much), but this is subtle and frames the pocket well.

Vogue 1236: No zipper and pockets - sensing a theme here in what I like? This one is a lot like Vogue 8645 that I already made, and I have to admit I feel a little weird paying for a pattern on something so very simple. This one at least has the neckline tucks that are interesting and not super easy to draft myself, and really, who am I kidding, I've never actually drafted a pattern. I like the high back neckline on this and the fact that they have little belt loops included (which I had to add to 8645), so this may be bought the next time Joann has a pattern sale. I will say this for Joann - I'll never buy patterns anywhere else or for full price with how often they have sales. Of course, that does mean I have about 20-30 patterns sitting around that haven't been made yet, but I have the option to make them anytime should I want to take it!

Vogue 8723: OK, I've given in and included one pattern with a zipper, but it has pockets at least to make up for that. I really like the high neckline - it's conservative without looking dowdy. And it's the same in the back too - a lot of high front necklines have a low back neckline, which I'm not a big fan of. It looks like the back zipper could be moved to the side without too much difficulty, so this is an option. I refuse to make anything other than formalwear with a back zipper. I need to be able to dress myself!

The last three are going on the list to be bought, or at least reevaluated, at the next pattern sale.

Friday, March 18, 2011

Progress report


It's been over a week since I posted my progress, so here it is. I am again actually farther than this, but don't have the pictures.

I gave myself the deadline of the end of March to finish the piecing of the strips, and I think I can make it. The back pieces go much faster - less curve to shape around, and shorter distance to sew. I'm really hoping the wrinkles will go away with a good steaming. This pic looks particularly wrinkly since the last strip is just pinned on, but it shows the process - pin the current pieces back onto Gertrude, then align the next two pieces (one on either side), pin them in place, then remove everything from Gertrude and sew by hand.

Doing everything by hand lets me really be precise about what goes where, and I think it's worth it for the final outcome. I hope! To get around the curves, I had to do a bit of gathering:

The gathering looks really, well, gathered, but I think it'll look more smooth in the final product. A lot of the gathering on the outside edge there went under the next piece - you can see in the top picture that it doesn't look gathered. Also, I think steaming a bit will help - silk can definitely be manipulated into shape with some steam, as I found out when originally pressing the formerly perfectly rectangular strips. Heavy steam and a tailor's ham should do the trick here, I hope!

Monday, March 7, 2011

Patterned


I tore up new strips of leftover fabric to get a gauge of how the fabric would curve. Good thing I can't stand to throw out scraps! The actual fabric (interfaced silk tubes, basically) is stiffer and won't curve quite as well, but this is a decent start. It's actually pretty in black and grey, I think - too bad my mother told me the one requirement for my wedding dress is that it not be black!

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

You Can Tell It's Made by an Engineer

It's time to get cracking on the wedding dress. Self-imposed deadline of the end of March for the bodice, and I've got crazy school deadlines in there too. It's time to ban myself from any other projects*. In the interest of pushing myself to keep making progress, I'm going to try to post progress updates. That way it won't feel like such a big project, when there are little milestones along the way.

* excepting the dress I'm making for our engagement pictures, which is almost finished anyways.

So below is the draft of what I want the dress to look like. This was a test version that I used to try out a bunch of different techniques, so it's sloppy and the colors aren't right, but you get the idea.

In order to make sure the sides are symmetric, I gave myself a grid to work off of. I couldn't find any skinny tape that wouldn't leave a sticky residue on poor Gertrude, so I just pinned ribbons. I think it's my engineering side coming through - I always feel more comfortable working on graph paper!
Next steps: 
1) Lay out strips of scrap fabric to outline where the final strips will go.
2) Make a couple dummy strips (good thing I hoard charmeuse remnants!), properly interfaced and everything, and practice hand sewing. If the hand sewing doesn't look quite right, I've already practiced doing it by machine, but I think the wedding dress is an appropriate place to take the time to do hand work! 

I'm thinking I need to wear gloves to avoid staining/mussing the silk. Latex gloves probably aren't very comfy but may do the trick. Besides, then I can look like a deranged scientist while sewing my dress! 


Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Finished! With the part no one will see...


The underlayer of the wedding dress is complete! Every time I walk by I get caught by how much I love the silhouette - that's probably a good thing, huh?


OK, it's only 98% there. The skirt probably needs an iron, but it'll need one soon before the wedding, so that can wait. Then the exposed elastic in the back needs to be finished (probably with bra hooks), but I want to adjust the fit later when I'm the same size I will be for the wedding. I learned my lesson after painstakingly fitting the corset, then losing 10 pounds! Of course, I'm slowly gaining that back, so I'll probably be back there come wedding time. At least the lace-up back gives some fit flexibility. 

The details: The (under) skirt was finished long (a year) ago, so I'll not talk about that. The corset I talked about previously,* but since then I have finally added silk-taffeta bias binding on the top and bottom edges and included eyelets for lacing. The right side of the bias binding is actually on the inside - I figured no one will see the outside once it's covered with the charmeuse stripes. I think the taffeta will give some good strength over the boning, and hopefully the ends won't end up poking through the lighter weight silk. 

* Seriously? That was in November? Oh man do I ever need to get cracking on this thing!

Now I just need to try it on and make sure it fits, though I'm not sure what I'll do if it doesn't. Then it can get relegated to a closet while I use Gertrude** to arrange the woven stripes and hand sew them. I set myself a goal of the end of January to finish the corset, and I only missed by a day, so I'm setting another goal: end of March to have all the stripes assembled. That'll leave May for the skirt (easy peasey, even with a trip to Montreal thrown in there) and June for the halter straps. Doable but I will have to buckle down and work on the dress instead of all my other fun projects!

** the dummy




Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Pendrell





Confession: I finished the blouse almost two weeks ago but just haven't had a moment to write it up. Too busy starting the next project! I did still wear it out the next day, so at least it's been worn if not documented. The pics* are of the blouse straight out of the laundry, so it's not perfectly pressed or anything.

* Also, this is not a fabric suited to JPEG compression!

I made a resolution to try out at least one new technique with each project, and on this one I did two. I used Kenneth King's technique to stay the neckline with silk organza, which seems to have worked well so far, but it's really time that will tell if the neckline droops. This did create one slight problem, or at least expose it - I have a giant head! My head could barely fit through the neckhole. Staying the neckline prevents it from stretching out of shape, but that means it couldn't stretch around my head. So I had to try another technique: I added a bias-bound keyhole opening at the back (documented here).
I'm pretty pleased with the result, not it the least because it makes the blouse wearable! Not bad for a first attempt at a new technique. Next time I may use a button instead of the ties, just because it's hard to tie a bow behind your head.

The one other fancy (but not new) technique I used was hand-sewing the hem. A machine sewn hem would stand out way too much on this fabric, especially when I plan on wearing it untucked. So I hand-stitched, making sure the stitches all fell in the black part of the pattern. Pretty invisible, no?


I used one of Joann's shiny polyester** fabrics. I have a weakness for these fabrics, since they feel so smooth and nice on the bolt. Wearing them is another matter. Still, I wanted a relatively cheap fabric to test out the Pendrell pattern before committing to almost 3 yards of expensive charmeuse.

** "Simply silky" they say, I say simply unbreathable.

Can't see it on the dummy pics (obv), but I think I would have been well served to do an FBA. The fabric flows well but doesn't drape, if that makes sense, so I get these folds in the princess seams above the bust. I think I could resolve this just by effectively darting out the excess and incorporating it into the seam. Of course, that is basically what an FBA would do - reduce the width above the bust. Next time!

I cut a size 8 for the bust and waist*** and a 6 for the hips. I think I should have left it at the 8 the whole way - it looks a little straight and boxy. I hemmed it to a good length for wearing untucked, since I never tuck anything in, so it's a little too short to stay tucked. It does look good tucked in tho, so the next one may stay an inch longer.

*** Since any smaller waist size wouldn't fit over the bust to put it on!

I'm not sure how the draped sleeves look on me - my hips and shoulders are pretty much even, and my shoulders are pretty prominent, so the drape adds a bit much to their size. It may just take some getting used to, though - the first time I wore boots with tights I thought it looked off, and now I'm practically living in that outfit this winter. I can see how this is a very flattering pattern for pear shapes - it adds oomph to the top/shoulders without being obvious about it.

All in all, the Pendrell is a fun pattern, and it sewed up nice and quickly. I need to wear it a few more times before I can decide on the draped sleeve, but if I get used to it, I will be knocking out a few more of these!

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Bias-bound keyhole


Turns out I have a giant head. I started sewing up my Pendrell blouse and discovered once I sewed the shoulder seams for the center front and back, my head didn't fit through the opening. Now, I did try out Kenneth King's technique for staying the neckline, so there won't be much give in the neckline, but I don't think it's supposed to give. I think I just have a big head.

So what to do? Finishing the neckline with the bias facing helped a little, getting rid of the seam allowances from within the neckline, but it's still a struggle to get it on. The solution? A keyhole opening in the back.

The keyhole is basically just a slit at the center back of the neckline. I decided to use French bias bound keyhole like Claire Shaeffer describes in High Fashion Sewing Secrets. Here's the process:

  1. Find the center back at the neckline (you can just fold and match the shoulder seams) and mark it with a pin. Decide how long you want the opening to be (I chose 2 1/2 inches, but seeing the end result I wish it'd been a bit longer) and mark the center back below that. Use a pin to mark both spots.
    Mark the center back.
    1. Draw a line where you want the slit to be.
    2. Mark the cutting line.
    3. Make a bias strip to bind the keyhole with. I cut a bunch of extra 2" bias strips when I was cutting the fabric, so I used one of these. I'm leaving it extra long so I can use the ends as ties to close the keyhole. If you want to close the keyhole with a button, you can just cut it somewhat larger than twice the length of the opening.
    4. Fold the strip in half and press.
    5. I used the bias strips that I happened to have to determine how wide my binding would be. Stretch the strip and measure how wide it ends up being. 
    6. Determine how much width you have to work with on your bias strip.
      Mine is 3/4". You want your finished binding to be just under 1/3 as wide as the folded, stretch strip, so I'm making mine a scant 1/4".
    7. Stay-stitch around the opening, just inside where the seam line will be. 
    8. Sloppy sewing on my part, it should theoretically be a bit cleaner and more trapezoidal at the bottom than this. I stitched at 3/16" to accommodate my scant 1/4" finished width. At the bottom, end it with a bit of a rounded point to smooth the bottom of the keyhole.
    9. Cut open along the mark, stopping just short of the stay-stitching at the bottom.
    10. Snip!

    11. Align the middle of the bias strip with the bottom of the opening to figure out where to start the strip. Match the raw edges of the strip with the raw edges of the opening, with the strip on the right side of the back, and stitch just outside the stay-stitching. 
    12. View from the wrong side
      View from the right side.

      I found it easier not to pin the whole strip in place before I started, because the curve at the bottom is difficult. Start at the top and just keep the raw edges aligned as you sew, stretching the bias strip slightly. Keep it stretched and stitch slowly at the bottom. You'll get some extra folds at the raw edges, I'm not sure this can be avoided. If the folded edge curves up a bit, that's fine, it doesn't need to be able to lay flat here since it will be turned to the inside.
    13. Fold the bias strip towards the back and then fold it once more, so it's wrapped around the raw edges.
    14. Hand-baste to hold the strip folded around properly. I know hand-basting is a pain, but this is such a short distance to baste that it's really not so bad, and it's worth it. 
    15. Stitch-in-the-ditch on the right side, catching the folded edge of the bias strip underneath. A zipper foot is helpful to line your needle up so you're right at the edge. This is why you hand-basted - it will ensure that the folded edge gets caught in your stitching when you can't see it. Remember how you made your binding width a bit less than 1/3 the width of the stretched strip? You have one piece caught inside (with the raw edges), one piece is the binding on the right side of the blouse, and one piece is the binding on the wrong side of the blouse. The little bit extra is to ensure that the fold goes past your binding seam, and to allow for cloth allowance
    16. Press the finished binding. This may take some work to push your fabric into shape. The hole in the blouse is a straight slit, but the bias binding makes it want to form more of a circle. Most of this should be resolvable with the iron. But depending on your fabric, if that's not enough...
    17. Add a dart in the binding at the bottom of the keyhole: fold the keyhole in half, and sew from the very bottom point to a point about 1/4" or so in from the fold. This will help the binding achieve the sharper corner we're looking for.
    18. If you're not using the ends of the bias strip as ties, skip ahead a couple steps.
    19. To use the long ends of the bias strip as ties, you need to finish the raw edges. Fold along the length of the strip (both ends) so it's folded the same way as the binding is around the slit, only without the blouse inside it. Basically, fold in the raw edges, slightly less than a third of the total width, and then fold that over the raw edges. If you look at the bias strip where it comes off the keyhole opening, it will show you the pattern to follow. Press to help hold the shape when you sew. This is probably a good time to cut them to the proper length, too.
    20. Sew the length of the bias strips. You can use a straight stitch, but I like a zig-zag with one end catching all the layers and one end catching only the central fold. The zig-zag will allow the bias binding to keep some of its intrinsic stretch. 
    21. Fold under the ends of the ties (or the ends of the bias strips at the end of the keyhole if you're using a button closure) and stitch them in place. Alternatively, you can just zig-zag the raw edge to prevent raveling.
    22. Depending how the final result turns out, depending on how your fabric behaves, etc, you may want to add a dart to make the strips come off the keyhole opening at an angle, so they go horizontal instead of vertical, the easier to tie them.
    23. And voila! Extra space to fit a giant head through, without sacrificing the cut of the neckline.
    One bonus tip too: I tie my bow just like tying sneakers. If you have issues with the loops of the bow going up and down instead of staying horizontal, switch which way you tie the knot underneath the bow. If you go right over left, try left over right, then tie the bow as usual. The way the bow lines up with that knot determines which way the bow tends to flop.

    Friday, January 14, 2011

    Fly fly away

    When I looked at patternreview.com for the pants I'm making (Simplicity 2700), some of the reviews warned me about the bad instructions for the fly. I figured, since I'm making a muslin, I may as well muslin up the fly so I can figure it out. Boy am I glad I did! Some issues were just unclear instructions, but there are a couple subtleties/changes I want to make. Picture heavy post, so everything else is after the break...

    Tuesday, January 11, 2011

    Pullover Dresses

    I'm a little over zippers in dresses right now. It's not about the pain of putting them in. Pants, after all, need a zip to feel finished and not like sweats. But for a dress, you either have a zip up the side, which isn't so comfy, or you need a zip up the back. There's something romantic about having the beau zip me into a fancy dress for a night out, but for a casual, every day dress? How am I supposed to be a lazy student and sleep in if I need him to help me into my clothes? Never mind the lack of independence that just grates.

    S0, I'm looking for pullover dress patterns. I don't mind sewing knits, but the local Joann, sadly my only local fabric shopping choice w/o driving up to SF, has no selection. A few solids that are a bit too sheer, so knits are out.

    Perusing the big 4, I've found a few options to add to the stash:
    The easiest is the shirt-dress: avoid the zip with buttons. Buttons in the front I can do myself, so this will work. Planning on this in a cotton broadcloth in this gorgeous dark turquoise.

    Then there's the theme of creating shape with a tie at the waist: Slip-like dress with tied shoulders. I've been eyeing this dress for a while, but couldn't justify theVogue pattern* for the stash. Knowing it's a pullover, I think I'm sold. And it has pockets!

    *Since, you know, Vogue is $3.99 on sale, and the others go on sale for $.99 often enough. I'm spoiled by pattern sales, I admit, but I can't justify buying a pattern for more than that unless I actually have a plan to make it.

    Another tie at the waist, but now it's a poufed top over a tie waist. I've seen a lot of these recently, which may mean they're in style, but I just don't see it being flattering on me.

    Then there's shaping with princess seams, a la the Pendrell. I think this will work a lot better in a blouse than a dress, but I want to see it in person first. Probably requires a very drapey fabric.

    And finally, the bias cut. Theoretically, bias cut is really hard to work with. The one time I tried, before I knew it was supposed to be hard, it worked out just fine, so I may try it again. I wouldn't start with a silk or anything like that, but maybe a somewhat stable polyester? It does have its uses...






    Friday, January 7, 2011

    New patterns!





    Woot! The new Simplicity and McCall's patterns are finally posted online. Every time Joann has a pattern sale, I look though the pattern catalogues again and again, so a little newness is much appreciated.

    I thought about going through and listing all the patterns that I have no idea why they were even made, but that's just mean spirited and, honestly, would take way too long. So between the two companies, here are the patterns I may just pick up at the next sale...

    Starting with McCall's. Something about their aesthetic just does not appeal to me, but I did find a couple maybes at least:

    I do love the gather in the center of the bust, but the issue is I have no idea how to fit a knit, and RTW tops like that always ride up on me. A maybe, but not super excited.

    It's like the Pendrell blouse on crack. But I do think the Pendrell blouse is much prettier, so I don't think I'll even bother buying this one.

    Now onto Simplicity. More luck here, with a couple maybes and a definite winner. Side note: no pictures here because Simplicity feels the need to hide their images behind flash, and I'm much too lazy to try to work around it.

    I find the Project Runway line has a lot of interesting patterns. I like how the princess seams turn into pleats on the skirt.

    Clearly from the prom dress collection, but could be cute with a longer skirt and a tone-on-tone sheer over opaque. I'm currently infatuated with the idea of a darker sheer over a lighter base, where the sheer gets darker in spots because of gathers or pleats. Not sure if this dress is exactly what I'm looking for though, seeing as I'm older than 16.

    And finally, the winner:
    I lovelovelove the woven detail (obviously, since that's the plan for the wedding dress). I'm a touch nervous about the fit on the model in the picture, there's a bulge under her armpit, but I'm hoping that's just because she lacks curves and the dress wasn't exactly fit for her. And of course, I'll leave out the little pile of fabric on the shoulder. I get ruffles or flowers, but when did a folded strip of fabric become a popular embellishment?

    Now to wait for a pattern sale...


    Thursday, January 6, 2011

    "Amazing" fit for who?


    I'm definitely going to try to attempt pants with the Cupcake Goddess's sewalong, but I figured that since I have a couple of "Amazing Fit" Simplicity patterns, I'd just use one of them instead of the Burda pattern.

    I like the idea of including a "slim," "normal," and "curvy" pattern piece, but their method for choosing which to use isn't exactly working for me. The directions tell you to pick your pattern size from your waist and hip measurements as usual, then to use your total crotch length and your back crotch length to determine curviness. OK, measurements taken, and the problem is my total crotch length measurement is 29 1/2". The longest crotch length measurement included is 28 1/2", for a size 22 curvy. My measurements are for a size 14, and I tend to make a size 12 because a 14 has way too much ease for me. A size 14 curvy is supposed to have a 26" crotch length, and the slim is 25". The one inch difference between slim and curvy just isn't cutting it for me, when I'm 3 and a half inches longer than the curvy. Now, I'll readily believe that I should make the curvy pattern, but there's no way I'm super excessively curvy.

    The issue, I'm sure, is how high my waist is. If I have to cover an extra inch or two in length to get up to my waist, double that for front and back and there's the difference. So how to determine which pattern piece? I'm pretty sure I'll end up making the curvy one, but I'd like to be right, you know?

    I've got two ways to attack this. One is using crotch depth - sit down on a chair and measure from waist to the chair seat. That should tell me how high my waist is. The problem is, how do I translate that to the default they're using?

    So I'm going to look at total crotch length and back crotch length. They each vary by a half inch per slim/normal/curvy step, so all the curviness is taking place in the back crotch. So, to account for extra waist height decrease my total crotch length by 2x, decrease the back crotch length by x, and find where they'll match with the listed dimensions. I'll try a size 14 since that is what my measurements indicate, and we're theoretically just dealing with body measurements and not and ease just yet.

    My measurements: TCL_mine=29.5, BCL_mine=16.75.
    So match TCL_curvy=26 for the 14, subtract 3.5 from TCL_mine. So that means I should subtract 1.75 from BCL_mine and I get 15. Their listing for a 14 BCL_curvy is 14.75, so this may work.

    Just for kicks, try the size 12: TCL_curvy=25.5, so I'm subtracting 4 inches. Take 2 inches from BCL_mine and get 14.75. BCL_curvy=14.5 for a 12.

    Side note: is my waist really (almost) two inches higher than normal? I know I have a long torso, but is it really that much? I wish wish wish that the pattern companies would list all the default measurements that they use, so I could compare mine to theirs and see what I should have to adjust that way. Maybe it's time to try out one of those fitting patterns... Except that the Vogue pants fitting pattern I have says that the normal crotch depth for a 12 is 11 5/8" and for a 14 it's 11 7/8", while mine is 11", so I actually have a short waist-crotch length? I'm so confused. I'm just going to make the curvy, since I know at least my thighs are wide, and we'll see how it fits in the muslin.

    Wednesday, January 5, 2011

    Inspiration: sweater peplum

    Now here's an idea: Add a peplum to a sweater that's just a touch too short, a la the tutorial by Jessi over at Adventures in Dressmaking. I'm thinking of one purple sweater in particular, which is really nice and fits great except for being just a touch to short, so if I take a deep breath you can see the tummy. I'm a touch nervous about mixing a woven with a knit, but if done right, I think the gathering should create enough give in the peplum.

    I'm still not sure I can get on the embellished knit bandwagon, but if I can salvage a nice sweater... it may just be worth a try.

    Tuesday, January 4, 2011

    What's in a name?

    So I'm thinking it may be time to switch up the ole blog name. When I started/named this blog years ago, my main hobbies were (watching) sports and gardening. So, Garden of Fenway seemed appropriate. Then of course I posted about three times and stopped.* Now, I've actually managed to keep up with a pseudo sewing blog, which is progress, but the name is too unrelated.

    * As I did with my attempt at a wedding blog and a conversion blog. See a pattern?

    So the new plan is to come up with an entirely unrelated-to-anything name, so I can just write about whatever I happen to be interested in. Ideally, said name will come along with a handle I can use in various online communities, so I don't have to worry about hatsforbats** being taken. Also, if I ever do start an etsy store,*** it can serve as the store name.

    ** The problem with a clever movie quote is that you aren't the only one who thinks it's clever.

    *** The current plan is to (someday) sell shibori silk scarves, since they're so fun to make but I have no justification to spend the money on supplies.

    So, what name to pick? I'm thinking something related to electromagnetics or MRI, since that's what my thesis is about and what my academic interest is in general, but certainly not something I'll blog about. A way to tie together my work and my hobbies, if you will. So for now, a brain dump of words/phrases that interest me:

    Induction
    Refraction/refracted
    Ultraviolet/infrared
    Precession
    Polarization
    Circularly polarized
    Waves
    Radiation
    Left-handed precession
    Coils
    Tesla, Gauss/Gaussian